In the several last essays you posted you discuss 'imaging' a lot. In two of them you use imaging as part of SATS. In one of them you discuss "all physical reference points will have been eliminated, but the feeling triggered by your SATS scene should remain."
Are you equating imaging/imagination to be only the ability of seeing images in your mind? In the past you have commented this wasn't necessary. Therefore, are you returning to the idea that imaging is one of the necessary tools to be in the correct state for manifestation?
Are there other paths to the belief without imaging (assuming imaging is just visualization). Or can one just create a belief/faith alone to form a state and have that belief lead into behavior of the state which leads into manifesting the state.
People have strong beliefs (faith) in their God without visualization. Many times it is just meditative prayer.
Perhaps a clearer clarification of how imaging, belief, feelings, thought, state all can lead to manifesting a desire. Is one more powerful than the other or do they all inter-connect or stand alone?
I hope you can get a sense of what I'm trying to say. I've just seem to find lack of consistency in what you have said in the past concerning the process of manifestation since a person just doesn't wake up one day and find themselves in the needed state for manifesting.
The exact point I've been trying to make is the irrelevance of "imaging" or having a visual representation connected to a feeling. So, no, visual imagination is not necessary to manifest. I use SATS as a reference point because people are familiar with it. But again, no, visual imagining is not necessary. Feeling is necessary, and feeling has nothing to do with visual imagery, even if its accompanied for some by visual imagery.
In the several last essays you posted you discuss 'imaging' a lot. In two of them you use imaging as part of SATS. In one of them you discuss "all physical reference points will have been eliminated, but the feeling triggered by your SATS scene should remain."
Are you equating imaging/imagination to be only the ability of seeing images in your mind? In the past you have commented this wasn't necessary. Therefore, are you returning to the idea that imaging is one of the necessary tools to be in the correct state for manifestation?
Are there other paths to the belief without imaging (assuming imaging is just visualization). Or can one just create a belief/faith alone to form a state and have that belief lead into behavior of the state which leads into manifesting the state.
People have strong beliefs (faith) in their God without visualization. Many times it is just meditative prayer.
Perhaps a clearer clarification of how imaging, belief, feelings, thought, state all can lead to manifesting a desire. Is one more powerful than the other or do they all inter-connect or stand alone?
I hope you can get a sense of what I'm trying to say. I've just seem to find lack of consistency in what you have said in the past concerning the process of manifestation since a person just doesn't wake up one day and find themselves in the needed state for manifesting.
The exact point I've been trying to make is the irrelevance of "imaging" or having a visual representation connected to a feeling. So, no, visual imagination is not necessary to manifest. I use SATS as a reference point because people are familiar with it. But again, no, visual imagining is not necessary. Feeling is necessary, and feeling has nothing to do with visual imagery, even if its accompanied for some by visual imagery.